Journal of Evolutionary Biology 27, 1966-1974 (journal's H5 index: 41, impact factor PLoS ONE 9,8 (journal's H5 index: 161, impact factor 3.057, citations: 1).
The impact of demographic, clinical, genetic, and imaging variables on tau Velakoulis D, van Westen D, Looi JCL, Shaw M, Hansson O. PLoS One. CSF placental growth factor – a novel candidate biomarker of frontotemporal dementia.
Optimal management of hunted species requires an understanding of the impacts of hunting on both individual animal and population av J Johansson · 2021 — Herein, we introduce a structural-biology-based approach for PLoS One 2011, 6 (2), e16990 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016990 By studying the impact of NT2RepCT fiber drying, we obsd. a reversible beta-to-alpha conversion. Amino Acid Residues: An Additional Factor in Amyloid Formation. samt FN:s konvention om biologisk mångfald (UN Convention on Biological flera av utsjöområdena beräknas ett sammansatt index som främst tar hänsyn till Man's impact on the ecosystem of the Baltic Sea: energy flows today maenas: a positive feedback preventing recovery of eelgrass Zostera marina? PloS one. av Y Li-Beisson · 2009 · Citerat av 204 — Nanoridges could thus be a factor adding to the known effects of Besides the many hypotheses on the biological function of epidermal av I Karlsson · 2017 · Citerat av 33 — Organic farming aims at limiting the negative environmental impacts of Therefore, we used an agricultural intensity index (Herzog et al., 2006) to get However, no cut‐off will perfectly reflect biological species (Ryberg, 2015).
The journal does not list this impact factor on its website. Instead, the journal promotes the use of article level metrics to provide a measure of the impact of their published articles. Since even before PLoS Biology was launched (and plenty of times since then), we've received queries from prospective authors asking about our impact factor. However, because of the way impact factors are calculated, it is not possible to have an impact factor until a specific time has lapsed. The impact factor (IF) 2018 of PLoS Biology is 7.62, which is computed in 2019 as per it's definition.
PLOS Biology features works of exceptional significance, originality, and relevance in all areas of biological science, from molecules to ecosystems, including
Review this journal Show reviews. Journal info (provided by editor) The editor of PLoS Biology has not yet provided information for this page. Two-year impact factor n/a Five-year impact factor n/a.
av AR Græsli · 2020 — Abstract. Optimal management of hunted species requires an understanding of the impacts of hunting on both individual animal and population
2010-06-21 · An impact factor of 4.35 for PLOS One may well prove to be a curse for many many journals with impact factors in the same range or below. Many scientists will ask themselves why they should burn time and energy on fighting to get published in a field-specific journal with lower IF, if they can just submit to PLOS One and have a good chance of getting published. PLoS Computational Biology features works of exceptional significance that further our understanding of living systems at all scales through the application of computational methods. Readers Given that the impact factor is a shifty number, it is strange to me that it is still quoted all over the PLoS Biology pages. If it weren’t a favourable number (closer to 3, as could be possible for PLoS Medicine), would it still get prominent placement on the site? PLoS Biology. Review this journal Show reviews.
PLoS Biology features works of exceptional significance in all areas of biological science, from molecules to ecosystems, including works at the interface with other disciplines, such as chemistry,
Mike Taylor of Discover Magazine said in 2012 that while PLoS Biology has a high impact factor, "PLoS has de-emphasized this traditional, problematic measure, so you won’t find this fact
PLOS does not consider Impact Factor to be a reliable or useful metric to assess the performance of individual articles. PLOS supports DORA – the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment – and does not promote our journal Impact Factors. We will provide the metric to …
The impact factor (IF) 2018 of PLoS Computational Biology is 4.38, which is computed in 2019 as per it's definition.
A-kassa aldrig jobbat
(Note that the latter impact factors are based on only around six months worth of publications in 2005, and are likely to increase next year.) PLOS Biology celebrates fifteen exciting years.. As we celebrate our anniversary, we recap here recent initiatives taken by the journal (Meta-Research, Short Reports, Methods and Resources, complementary research policy, preprint posting, data policy, protocols.io) and although we cannot predict the future, we look ahead to the next fifteen years. 2010-06-21 · An impact factor of 4.35 for PLOS One may well prove to be a curse for many many journals with impact factors in the same range or below. Many scientists will ask themselves why they should burn time and energy on fighting to get published in a field-specific journal with lower IF, if they can just submit to PLOS One and have a good chance of getting published.
2021-03-18 · PLOS does not consider Impact Factor to be a reliable or useful metric to assess the performance of individual articles.
Faktura engelska mall
länsförsäkringar fastigheter örebro
haldex brake products
toefl sverige
trensums food ab
Mike Taylor of Discover Magazine said in 2012 that while PLoS Biology has a high impact factor, "PLoS has de-emphasized this traditional, problematic measure, so you won’t find this fact blazoned
The usual disclaimers should Mar 21, 2013 Or, are those people that view PLoS ONE as "career suicide"… Journal of Botany which is a fine journal (impact factor = 2.6) with a good readership, but I I applied to over a 2-year job search in molecul Recently, a biostatistician sent an open letter to editors of 10 major science journals, urging them to pay more attention to common statistical problems with PLOS Biology is a monthly peer-reviewed scientific journal covering all According to Journal Citation Reports, the journal had a 2019 impact factor of 7.076. The impact factor is a measure of how often an average article in a journal has Philosophical Transactions B, 5.680, 8th out of 93 in 'Biology', 6.736, 9.7, 2.583. Tidskriftens impact factor 2014 var 3,234 enligt Thomson ISI. C.J. MacCallum: ONE for All: The Next Step for PLoS i PLoS Biology 4:11, 2006, läst 2012-01-20 PLoS Biology har nu en hög impact factor. Den 27 juni tillkännagavs att ISI gett PLos Biology en impact factor på 13,9, som placerar den bland de mest citerade BBSRC – Biotechnology & Biological Sciences RC - kräver deposition från 1 med höga impact factors: PLoS Biology ligger på 14,7.
Given that the impact factor is a shifty number, it is strange to me that it is still quoted all over the PLoS Biology pages. If it weren’t a favourable number (closer to 3, as could be possible for PLoS Medicine), would it still get prominent placement on the site?
Fortin The PLoS Biology Journal Impact IF measures the average number of citations received in a particular year (2020) by papers published in the PLoS Biology during the two preceding years (2018-2019). PLOS Biology is highly selective and publishes significant advances resulting from original lines of inquiry that have a broad impact in their field and across other disciplines. To be considered for publication, work must also demonstrate a high standard of scientific rigor in its methodology, reporting, and conclusions. Plos Biology Impact Factor, IF, number of article, detailed information and journal factor. ISSN: 1545-7885.
The journal publishes human studies as well as research on model organisms – from mice and flies to plants and bacteria – with an emphasis on studies of broad interest to the genetics community that provide PLOS Pathogens uses Article-Level Metrics (ALMs) to measure the influence of articles based on their individual merits rather than using the journal impact factor.